Case Report

Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Published: Jan 12, 2025 | Pages: 098 - 103 | DOI: 10.24911/JBCGenetics.183-1723713112

Acquired duplication of isochromosome 21's resulting in pentasomy 21 with concurrent 13q deletion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a rare co-occurrence


Authors: Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser , Anurita Pais , Cigdem Pala Ozturk


Article Info

Authors

Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser

Bahrain Oncology Centre, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain

Anurita Pais

Bahrain Oncology Centre, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain

Cigdem Pala Ozturk

Bahrain Oncology Centre, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain

Publication History

Received: September 05, 2024

Revised: November 20, 2024

Accepted: December 22, 2024

Published: January 12, 2025


Abstract


Background Pentasomy involving duplication of isochromosome 21;der(21;21)(q10;q10) is a rare cytogenetic abnormality linked primarily to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and less frequently to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). These abnormalities often occur in complex karyotypes and might co-occur with t(12;21). Case Presentation A unique case of ALL was reported in a 14-year-old male presented with pentasomy 21 from duplicated der(21;21)(q10;q10) along with deletion 13q as primary abnormalities. Bone marrow and flow cytometry showed 90% B-lymphoid blast cells. Chromosome analysis and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed interstitial deletion 13q and der(21;21)(q10;q10) duplication, resulting in five RUNX1 gene signals. While duplicated isochromosome/isodicentric chromosome 21 was documented in isolated cases of ALL and AML, this was the first report of this abnormality co-existing with deletion 13q in the present case of ALL, suggesting a unique contribution to disease pathogenesis. The amplification of 21q genes, including RUNX1, ETS, and ERG, might influence pathogenesis and warrants further investigation. Conclusion The co-occurrence of Pentasomy 21 and 13q deletions represented a novel finding, prompting investigations into their combined impact on clinical outcomes. This unique cytogenetic combination highlighted the need for further studies to understand its impact on ALL pathophysiology.

Keywords: Derivative (21;21)(q10;q10), Fluorescence in situ hybridization, FISH, Karyotype, Pentasomy 21, 13q deletion, Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Case report



Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser et al. JBC Genetics. 2024;7(2):098-103

Journal of Biochemical and Clinical Genetics

Acquired duplication of isochromosome 21 resulting in pentasomy 21 with concurrent 13q deletion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a rare co-occurrence; review of literature.

Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser1*, Anurita Pais1, Cigdem Pala Ozturk1

Correspondence to: Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser

*Bahrain Oncology Center, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Email: suhaib.abunaser@khuh.org.bh

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

Received: 15 August 2024 | Accepted: 22 December 2024


ABSTRACT

Background:

Pentasomy involving duplication of isochromosome 21;der(21;21)(q10;q10) is a rare cytogenetic abnormality linked primarily to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and less frequently to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome. This abnormality often occur in complex karyotypes and might co-occur with t(12;21).


Case Presentation:

A unique case of ALL was reported in a 14-year-old male presented with pentasomy 21 from duplicated der(21;21)(q10;q10) along with deletion 13q as primary abnormalities. Bone marrow and flow cytometry showed 90% B-lymphoid blast cells. Chromosome analysis and Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed interstitial deletion 13q and der(21;21)(q10;q10) duplication; resulting in five RUNX1 gene signals. While duplicated isochromosome/isodicentric chromosome 21 was documented in isolated cases of ALL and AML, this was the first report of this abnormality co-existing with deletion 13q in the present case of ALL, suggesting a unique contribution to disease pathogenesis. The amplification of 21q genes, including RUNX1, ETS, and ERG, might influence pathogenesis and warrants further investigation.


Conclusion:

The co-occurrence of Pentasomy 21 and 13q deletion represented a first report, prompting investigations into their combined impact on clinical outcomes. This unique cytogenetic combination highlighted the need for further studies to understand its impact on ALL pathophysiology.


Keywords:

Derivative (21;21)(q10;q10), fluorescence in situ hybridization, karyotype, pentasomy 21, acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Introduction

Chromosomal alterations as structural and numerical changes in chromosome 21 and chromosome 13, are commonly observed in hematological malignancies.

Among the different structural and numerical abnormality patterns of chromosome 21 amplification in the form of isochromosome 21/der(21;21)(q10;q10)/Isodicentric chromosome 21 is a rare abnormality seen in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), typically associated with complex karyotypes. In some instances, der(21;21)(q10;q10) has shown co-occurrence with a recurrent translocation of t(12;21) in pediatric ALL, and it was also observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [1,2].

A study by Mitchell et al. [3] identified isochromosomes in the form of der(21;21)(q10;q10) as a significant chromosomal abnormality in hematologic malignancies, linking its presence to various forms of leukemia in disease progression.

The rare occurrence of duplicated isochromosome 21s in pediatric ALL and its potential clinical impact was emphasized for its role in a better prognosis in comparison to other isochromosomes with a gene dosage effect with overexpression of specific genes that contributed to the proliferation of leukemic cells [4,5].

On the other hand, deletion 13q another distinct rare entity in childhood ALL was reported to be associated with poor prognosis particularly due to the loss of tumor suppressor genes present near the D13S319 region which has been documented as a critical event in disease progression [6].

Most commonly der(21;21)(q10;q10) and the 13q deletion are typically associated with complex karyotypes involving secondary events. The Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancer reports approximately 48 cases of derivative chromosomes in the form of isodicentric (21) (IDIC), with variations in breakpoints, including around 26 cases involving centromeric breakpoints region p11. Duplication of IDIC(21) was observed in 7 cases, with only 2 instances reported as primary sole abnormalities. The co-occurrence of duplication of derivative (21;21) and 13q deletion as distinct sole primary cytogenetic abnormalities contributing to dosage effect variations in ALL is extremely rare [7].

This case study represented the 5th reported instance of a primary sole duplicated der(21;21)(q10;q10) abnormality and the first to involve the co-occurrence of 13q deletion as a primary event, suggesting their joint role in the pathogenesis of the disease.


Case Presentation

The present case was of a 14-year old boy who presented with a one-month history of fatigue, intermittent fever, night sweats, weight loss, poor appetite, nausea, and knee pain, along with multiple enlarged cervical lymph nodes (more prominent on the right side), ranging from 2 to 4 cm, non-tender, hard, and immobile were observed. There were no palpable axillary or inguinal lymph nodes. The patient had no significant family history of malignancies, including lymphoma or leukemia.

Laboratory results showed normal sodium, potassium, serum creatinine, and liver function tests, but elevated lactate dehydrogenase (291U/l) and uric acid levels (506 µmol/l).

A peripheral blood smear revealed 61% blasts, with a complete blood count showing an elevated white blood cell count (65.95 × 10³/µl), low hemoglobin (9.5g/dl), and a low platelet count (62 × 10³/µl). The peripheral blood smear showed leukocytosis with 61% circulating blasts with a high N/C ratio and distinct nucleoli (Figure 1).

A chest X-ray was unremarkable, and CT scans of the chest, abdomen, neck, and pelvis were performed. Bone marrow (BM) aspiration analysis at diagnosis showed hypercellular bone marrow with approximately 95% blast infiltration, marked depression of trilineage hematopoiesis. The blast exhibited a high N/C ratio and distinct nucleoli, some showed cytoplasmic blebs and/or pseudopods (Figure 2).

Immunostaining showed diffuse positive CD34 (D), CD79a (E), and CD10 (F), denoting B-Lymphoblasts. BM aspirate smear showed hypercellular bone marrow and total infiltration with blast cells having a high N/C ratio (Figure 3).

Figure 1. Peripheral blood smear showing blast cells with a high N/C ratio and distinct nucleoli.

Figure 2. Bone marrow aspirate smear showing hypercellular bone marrow and total infiltration with blast cells having a high N/C ratio and distinct nucleoli, some show cytoplasmic blebs and/or pseudopods.

Flow cytometry of peripheral blood identified 88% blasts which were positive for CD34, TdT, CD19, CD79a, CD10, CD81, CD86 and negative for CD20, CD13, CD11b, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD64, CD117, CD56, CD3, CD2, CD5, CD4, and CD8 and partially positive for HLA-DR, CD33, CD7, CD58 (Figure 4).

These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia, specifically common Pre-B ALL. At diagnosis RT-PCR for BCR/ABL1 fusion, a common genetic marker, was negative, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed no involvement.

The patient commenced treatment on the BFM Induction IA protocol for ALL. After completing the BFM Induction IA Protocol, the patient underwent repeat bone marrow aspiration and flow cytometry that revealed a complete remission (CR) with minimal residual disease (MRD) of 0.02%. Throughout the treatment protocol, the patient continued to maintain MRD-negative with no signs of CNS involvement or other complications noted during his treatment course.

Two fully HLA-matched donors were identified for potential allogeneic stem cell transplantation, which is being considered if CR is not achieved. Chromosome analysis and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed two abnormalities deletion 13q and der(21;21)(q10;q10) with duplication in all the metaphase cells analyzed represented as 47,XY,del(13)(q12q14),der(21;21)(q10;q10)x2[20] (Figure 5).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated two RUNX1 signals on each of the der(21;21)(q10;q10), resulting in a total of five RUNX1 signals and interstitial deletion 13q in 95% of interphase cells using Vysis ETV6/RUNX1 fusion and deletion 13q FISH probe. The rest of the recurrent fusion markers, i.e., ETV6/RUNX1, BCR/ABL1, and TCF3/PBX1 fusion were negative along with a negative status for MLL and IGH gene rearrangements (Figure 6).

Figure 3. Bone marrow trephine core biopsy slides showing markedly hypercellular bone marrow with diffuse infiltration by sheets of blast cells with high N/C ratio, open chromatin, and distinct nucleoli (A, B, C Hematoxylin and Eosin), immunostaining showed diffuse positive CD34 (D), CD79a (E), and CD10 (F), denoting B-Lymphoblasts.

Figure 4. Flow cytometry with immunophenotyping.

Figure 5. Karyotype showing deletion 13q and duplication of derivative(21;21)(q10;q10).

Figure 6A. Interphase cells using ETV6/RUNX1 fusion probe showing 5 copies of RUNX1 (green) indicating extra copies of chromosome 21. B: Interphase cells with Deletion 13q probe showing 2 Green and 1 Red signal indicating interstitial loss of 13q14 region.


Discussion

The co-occurrence of der(21;21)(q10;q10) and 13q deletions observed in the present case was a significant cytogenetic event, providing insight into the interplay of genetic alterations in leukemogenesis. The 13q deletions, especially those involving tumor suppressor genes like RB1 near the D13S319 marker, are known to drive tumorigenesis and are associated with poor prognosis, particularly in childhood ALL [8].

Pentasomy 21, arising from the duplication of the derivative chromosome der(21;21)(q10;q10) through isochromosome formation, represented a rare form of focal chromosome 21 hyperdiploidy. This leads to the amplification of oncogenes such as RUNX1, ETS2, and ERG, which possibly are contributed to hematopoietic dysregulation. While hyperdiploidy is typically linked to a favorable prognosis in ALL, tetrasomic abnormalities caused by endoreduplication are often associated with chromosomal instability and poor outcomes [9,10].

Literature study revealed similar chromosomal abnormalities across hematological malignancies, including ALL, AML, MDS, and transient myeloproliferative disorders in children with Down syndrome. Studies by Shimoyama et al. emphasized the role of duplicated isodicentric chromosomes in leukemogenesis via RUNX1 amplification in AML [6,11].

Similarly, Vijay et al. [12] describe recurrent isochromosome 21 in complex AML karyotypes, underscoring its clinical relevance. Meanwhile, deletions in the 13q12-13q14 regions had been linked to leukemogenesis through the inactivation of tumor suppressors like RB1, crucial for cell cycle regulation, and mutations in FLT3 that activate oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/AKT and RAS/MAPK. It was documented that in B-cell precursor ALL, deletions in the 13q12.2 region disrupt an enhancer upstream of FLT3, leading to increased FLT3 expression and ligand-independent activation, which drives leukemogenesis [13].

This case represented the first reported coexistence of Pentasomy 21 (arising from der(21;21)(q10;q10)) with a 13q deletion in ALL. The amplification of chromosome 21 oncogenes and loss of 13q tumor suppressor functions created a unique cytogenetic profile that might synergistically drive leukemic progression. Although Pentasomy 21 is distinct from iAMP21, a well-recognized subtype of ALL associated with poor prognosis, the shared feature of 21q gene amplification, including key genes such as RUNX1, ETS, and ERG, highlighted a potential area for further investigation. The iAMP21's aggressive clinical course is driven by amplification-induced gene dysregulation, raising the question of whether Pentasomy 21 might exhibit overlapping leukemogenic mechanisms [14,15].

Pentasomy 21, involving the amplification of 21q genes, introduces the possibility of overexpression of critical oncogenes such as RUNX1, ETS2, and ERG, which are known to contribute to hematopoietic dysregulation and leukemic transformation. Simultaneously, the 13q deletion a cytogenetic aberration often linked to poor prognostic outcomes suggested an additional layer of genomic instability.

The coexistence of these abnormalities might have synergistic effects, amplifying leukemic pathways and influencing prognosis. For instance, 13q deletions disrupt tumor suppressor genes, which could work in tandem with the overexpression of 21q genes from Pentasomy 21 to accelerate disease progression. This unique cytogenetic combination highlighted the need for further studies to understand its impact on ALL pathophysiology and prognosis to address this co-existence of primary sole abnormality.

The co-occurrence of Pentasomy 21 and 13q deletions represented a novel finding, prompting investigations into their combined impact on clinical outcomes. While existing studies provide foundational knowledge of the co-existence, this case highlighted a need for understanding the precise leukemogenic mechanisms underlying these cytogenetic abnormal co-occurrences. Further research is essential to elucidate their role in disease pathogenesis and prognostication. Evaluating clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses in similar cytogenetic profiles could provide valuable insights, ultimately guiding tailored treatment strategies for such rare cases.


List of Abbreviations

ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
AML Acute myeloid leukemia
BM Bone marrow
CR complete remission
FISH Fluorescence in situ hybridization
MDS Myelodysplastic syndrome
MRD Minimal residual disease

Conflict of interest

The authors of this article have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.


Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Consent for publication

The permission was obtained from the patient to publish the case and the accompanying images.


Author contributions

All the authors listed in this article contributed to the acquisition of data from the patient, drafting and writing the manuscript along with final approval of this version to be published.


Author details

Suhaib Mohammad Ali Abunaser1, Anurita Pais1, Cigdem Pala Ozturk1

  1. Bahrain Oncology Center, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain

References

  1. Salido M, Solé F, Espinet B, Fernández C, Zamora L, Woessner S, et al. Pentasomy 21 with two isochromosomes 21 in a case of acute myeloid leukemia without maturation. Cancer Genet Cytogen. 2002;132(1):71–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00529-5
  2. Sandhya Devi G, Ahmed F, Mundada MC, Khera R, Nambaru L, Mallavarapu K. Retrospective study of B lymphoblastic leukemia to assess the prevalence of TEL/AML1 in South India: a study of 214 cases and review of literature. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742611
  3. Mitchell RJ, Le Beau MM, Fisherman AE, Rowley JD. Isodicentric chromosomes in hematologic malignancies. Cancer Genet Cytogen. 1994;77(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(94)90019-1
  4. Koehler M, Schneider D, Eberhard HP, Göbel U. Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with isodicentric chromosome 21. Leukemia Res. 2000;24(6):507–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2126(00)00020-8
  5. Pui CH, Mullighan CG, Evans WE, Relling MV. Genetic alterations in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am. 2012;26(2):319–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2012.01.011
  6. Shimoyama M, Yamamoto K, Nishikawa S, Minagawa K, Katayama Y, Matsui T. Duplication of isodicentric chromosome 21, idic(21)(p11.2), leading to pentasomy 21q in acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia. Cancer Genet Cytogen. 2009;194(1):38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.04.019
  7. Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens F (Eds.). Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations and gene fusions in cancer. 2025. Available from: https://mitelmandatabase.isb-cgc.org
  8. Heerema NA, Sather HN, Sensel MG, Lee MK, Hutchinson RJ, Nachman JB, et al. Abnormalities of chromosome bands 13q12 to 13q14 in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(22):3837–44. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.22.3837
  9. Shetty D, Amare PK, Mohanty P, Talker E, Chaubal K, Jain H. Investigating the clinical, hematological, and cytogenetic profile of endoreduplicated hypodiploids in BCP-ALL. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2020;85:102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2020.102465
  10. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumors: WHO classification of tumors. 5th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; vol. 11, 2024.
  11. Mertens F, Johansson B, Mitelman F. Isochromosomes in neoplasia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994;10(4):221–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.2870100402
  12. Vijay S, Sarojam S, Raveendran S, Syamala V, Leelakumari S, Narayanan G, et al. Recurrent isochromosome 21 and multiple abnormalities in a patient suspected of having acute myeloid leukemia with eosinophilic differentiation - a rare case from South India. Chinese J Cancer. 2012;31(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.011.10201
  13. Yang M, Safavi S, Woodward EL, Duployez N, Olsson-Arvidsson L, Ungerbäck J. 13q12.2 deletions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia lead to upregulation of FLT3 through enhancer hijacking. Blood. 2020;136(8):946–56. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019004684
  14. Harrison CJ, Moorman AV, Schwab C, Carroll AJ, Raetz EA, Devidas M, et al. An international study of intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21): cytogenetic characterization and outcome. Leukemia. 2014;28(5):1015–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.317
  15. Gao Q, Harrison CJ. B-ALL with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 in a carrier of the Robertsonian translocation rob(14;21)c. Blood. 2024; 143(25):2672. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024023923